For something that claims to be the world's best reactive load box, this is not the choice I would have gone with. Balanced outputs over TRS makes sense if you have a case design issue to deal with or you're solidly in the consumer market. I don't get why the Ox has multiple USB ports which the manual states are non functional but doesn't have XLR outputs. UAD's $1300 audio device at least has this but with only 44.1kHz SPDIF for a digital output. It is a weird design decision when a unit with a built in 24/96 ADC/DAC lacks a digital output, like the Captor X. The modeled cabinets in the Ox cover pretty much all of the basic bases but having specific IRs for your personal tone is such a big deal lately that this is a surprising weakness. In the studio I use a better IR loader in the chain or at mixdown and it isn't a big deal. In a live situation it's more than enough to get the job done. I like that I can load whatever IRs I want on the Captor X but the max time available per IR is kind of weak for studio work. It is considerate that the Captor X will allow for a wet/dry situation instead of stereo out if you make use of them. The effects on either are nice if you lack them elsewhere. Furthermore I can get two Captor Xes for less than I'd pay for a single Ox and cover 99% of the amps out there. The range of impedance with the Ox is great on paper but I have never owned an amp that wouldn't drive an 8 ohm cabinet. This may change when we're all back to playing in a room with a band, who knows. It's main features are more for 1) 'reducing' stage volume while delivering either a stereo send to front of house or two mono (differently EQd) sends - one to FOH and the other to the monitors. I haven't noticed that the available settings are an issue with the Captor X when playing solo or tracking. With the Captor, the attenuator won't get you down to whisper quiet with raging gain tones. The more granular attenuation options on the Ox would be a draw for me if most of my amps didn't have a master volume (which is true at the moment but not generally speaking). Torpedo Captor X is a compact reactive load box, tube amp attenuator, miked cab simulator, IR loader and stereo expander for. This is something Palmer was doing for decades before either of these came along and at this point there isn't a whole lot of new ground to cover for those tasks. Functionally speaking they do equally well at what you *need* them to do, which is power amp attenuation and DI. If they were at the same price point this would be a reasonable discussion but IMO there is nothing about the Ox that makes it worth the extra money.īoth are nicely built products with decent hardware UIs. The cabs all sound fantastic and close enough to the real speakers they are simulating. It feels natural and creative, not as limiting as the other devices but constrained enough that you don’t endless tweak settings. The OX is a fun and exciting experience to use. I have it, the Suhr RL, and the Mesa load. If money isn’t a concern, the OX is my favorite load box on the market. You can set it to DI and then load IR in a plug-in for recording, but if you’re just wanting to jam on headphones straight from the unit, you are limited to the onboard cabinets. I do find the SM57 model to be a little lackluster and unrealistic though.Ī major con of the OX is that you can’t load your own IR. I find TN cabs to be tedious and filled with more bad tones than good, while OX reacts how I expect, being familiar with miking cabinets with similar mics to what they simulate. I greatly prefer the cabinets on the OX to the Two Notes software. Just something I wanted to share, I'm not affiliated with Two Notes in any way.I haven’t had the Two Notes hardware, but I do have the plugin. I even merged the profiles with the "full" profiles I made while capturing Two Notes' IR and I think it's a wonderful solution. It's also very useful for creating direct profiles: the Captor X can send out direct signal without any processing and so I was able to make some direct profiles of my amps in complete silence, which sound great when played through a cab or the Kabinet. Yesterday I was messing around with the Two Notes Torpedo Captor X and thought: what if I plug the output of this thing into the return of the KPA and make a profile? How will that sound? The results are extremely convincing and now I can profile in silence! Granted, you're actually profiling one of Two Notes' IR's (in this case a Two Rock 2x12 IR) but I frankly cannot hear any significant difference between the profiles I made with the Captor X and the one I made with my actual Two Rock 2x12 and a mic in front of it. I was thinking about constructing a box to place the cabinet and mics in but never got around to it. I was always looking for a way to profile some of my 100W tube amps without blowing the windows out of my house.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |